Helped and Not Assisted

Life will improve once there’s an end to assistance. Recipients can’t take much more. Self-righteousness isn’t as beneficial as practitioners want their marks to believe. Enforcement by law makes declining what we’re forced to accept difficult. Care packages are nothing but cinder blocks.

It’d be more adorable that liberals think they’re helping if we didn’t cope with the ghastly consequences of the actuality. Applying theories to reality without leveling incomes and dreams is beyond their skill set, which makes it like everything else useful. Those trying to be productive wish their self-appointed rulers involved themselves meddling something useless, as it’d be an upgrade. Harming with contributions is the signature move.

Anyone who’s poor in more than one sense who’s targeted for salvaging begs those allegedly dispensing it. But our world’s faux heroes simply won’t stop believing they’re saving. After all, they’re being active. Adding oregano into your birthday cake batter is not useful, but they were helping with baking. You can’t scold someone who did so much stirring.

The one thing that won’t be saved is cash. Class warfare-wagers have to pretend they’re going to do something useful with what’s plundered to justify how much they enjoy legal thieving.

Efficient policy is based in taking what’s made from the right sort of people. A rich person is anyone making more than you. Taxes are the price we pay for civilization, according to rather uncivilized people who know how to spend even better than those who earned that money do. Plundering warriors don’t include themselves in the class warfare bombing target planning, of course: only villains who dared make companies successful by accepting money for whatever customers wanted must be hunted as a peddler of greed.

Retaining what you’ve received is avaricious, according to those who want money others earned. Preening about the right to send away more to be incinerated is an adorable attempt at preemption by liberals who always forget they can volunteer to help those struggling. That includes the Treasury if anyone believes America’s government is a worthy recipient. Remember to post screenshots. It’s not that we don’t trust you.

Anyone who worked hard should be proud to keep what they earn. That’s why government fans hate it. Living on your own terms is the country’s entire point. If you want to feel selfless, exchange something. Sacrifice comes in trading what you’ve made to those who’ve produced something you want.

Posturing about giving away what’s taken by the government in order to help is as counterproductively useless as making a scene about wearing a mask to flaunt a commitment to the collective’s health. The symbol of pretending to help may as well be recycled into safety nets.

The dedication to incomplete exhaling flaunt the liberal devotion to making a show of what doesn’t help in a most inadvertent way. Poor dears hated how their smug smiles were concealed by pretending it meant they cared for others.

Our top scientific hall monitors are too busy enforcing rules to question whether they help. Anyone actually interested in evidence might want to ponder for one moment that face cloaks may not have even saved breath. And wait until they realize trusting the vaccine means you don’t have to fret what others do. But smugness might offer enough protection. Doubt exposes us all.

Compulsory charity really gets the point. I hope those seizing what productive humans received as compensation enjoy the feeling that they’re amazing people, as the assistance aspect never occurs naturally. Like all their other amazing notions, orders are necessary. Absurdity doesn’t occur naturally to those who accept it as policy.

The whole point is to click the donate button oneself. Forced giving displays an appalling lack of faith in humanity and a disturbing inadvertent admission of a refusal to give voluntarily. Anyone genuinely interested in helping realizes the most efficient way to help is by choosing which groups need it most. But compassion whores don’t believe in markets for anything else, either.

Self-satisfaction is good enough, according to addicts. Those who think caring is all it takes never check results. That would just be cruel. You possess the temerity to check if people trying to help actually did as intended? What next: letting those who accuse others of crimes be cross-examined by an attorney representing the defendant?

The temerity to note what happens spoils countless swell aspirations. The only thing as cruel is learning one’s unofficial major of social justice isn’t valuable upon leaving campus. Telling everyone who doesn’t relinquish property and autonomy how much harm they’ve caused is one way to feel superior. Feeling satisfied on one’s own terms is too challenging.

Endless invasions into autonomy have rendered countless humans poor even if they weren’t being kept from moving about freely well into a second year. Orders to stay still date back way before the virus era. Sure, you can’t be productive. But you’ll be sort-of safe. Not really.