The Right to Choose Choosing What’s Right

Anthony Bialy
4 min readMay 6, 2022

--

Moloch is ticked. A potential lack of sacrifices overcomes appreciation for the chaos behind leaking a decision. Those who insist gender changes with a decision between sexes that are indistinct fume that women will not be able to forcibly remove babies growing inside them. You may notice that everyone furious about the Supreme Court possibly treating a states’ issue as such has already been born. It’s better to have adults shrieking instead of babies. Birthing people might have to give birth to people.

Intimidating government workers at the Supreme Court from completing their tasks is one more middle finger to the Constitution. Abortion is the one right that exists, according to those who think government should make every other decision. Free speech and guns are for icky reactionaries who love hate speech and murder and thus should be infringed even if they’re technically written down. Meanwhile, the right to abort is on the document’s back next to privacy, separation of church and state, and compulsion to buy crummy insurance.

Treatment of the most vulnerable defines everyone else. Involving government in every matter except halting wanton attacks on the embodiment of innocence creates thorough poverty. Those whose commitment to politics is based on making a show of aiding those most at risk are full of it the other times, too. Conservatives care about babies right until they’re born, according to class warfare warriors who demand infants become wards of the welfare state.

Science’s most rabid fans want to know when they can stop looking away. Please remove the sonogram, as that looks suspiciously like a baby. Next, you’ll tell me masks stopped the virus as well as random chance.

Very late birth control creates problems with the whole way birth wasn’t really controlled. The reason for virtually all abortions is disregarded by those who very rationally use sob stories. You could get most people to permit legality following rape or incest. And the mother’s health takes precedent as long as is the situation doesn’t involve wayward doctors handing out excuses with winks. But trying to pretend almost every abortion’s reason involves not wanting to bother coping with a consequence of fun is like me claiming I patronize strip clubs for the buffet.

Wait until those losing their minds learn how many state laws they must obey. They truly are dedicated to not learning our system. Abortion of course won’t be banned even if the Supreme Court follows through despite the leak for intimidation. Instead, each of 50 little spots within the larger country will get to each decide instead of a couple justices inventing a right. The legal level should’ve always been such, so the reset would be nothing more than returning to factory settings.

Maybe people are confused because lines on a map aren’t really there when you drive long enough. The precious sacrament of the amoral will remain legal in some spots, so they can thank federalism. You just have to pretend those decaying areas are thriving. The same delinquent states that chased away residents with preposterous taxes and superstitious mandates want to kill off their next generation that doesn’t flee. If Blue States believe in evolution, they should stop trying to make themselves extinct.

Abortion won’t be safe anymore, claim those who disregard how very unsafe it is for its targets. Their misguided take on victimhood is only matched by their disregard for law. States deciding to respect the right to be born create options that liberals also loathe. At least they’re thorough. Jurisdictions competing like they’re companies means the worst possible result for those who simply cannot bring a life into the world is an abortion vacation. California could use more currency no matter if it’s speckled with blood.

Even a wholesale ban that’s not happening ignores that we have restrictions for a reason. Biology might not be in vogue, but there’s still a person growing inside one gender following certain acts of incautious carnality. We’re not anarchists even though criminality continues. Abortions will still go on. Similarly, there will always be muggings. We somehow insist on having laws despite how people occasionally break them.

Preening about offing the inconvenient will go obsolete way faster than gasoline-powered engine. The abortion debate will soon be a historical footnote like slavery. Unconscionable advocates get more vociferous the more appalling it gets. Defenders never think of those harmed.

Support will fade quickly once truthfulness wins out as much as factuality. The reality of what an abortion actually entails is already clear, so denial is the only option for those who claim they’re deeply into evidence. Society will look back with shame that such barbarism was not only tolerated but treated by sick defenders as a basic right. Contrast opposition to gay marriage, only make it about ending life instead of thinking adults can enter into any relationships they want while viewing matrimony as a special ceremony between members of different genders. Guess which stance horrifies the sanctimoniously woke.

Think of the poor sufferers who have to relocate to an area where the conceived can be hunted. Convincing themselves ending life before it starts is about empowerment leads to the affectedly pious tantrums that presume preserving life is misogynistic. The Handmaid’s Tale isn’t becoming nonfiction, so those who enjoy preposterous melodrama have to cite a less tiresome book.

Zealots committed to permitting ending it all for casualties who don’t get a choice naturally use mendaciously self-righteous framing to distract from the real issue. The horror that entails the actual procedure is curiously dodged. Exercise the right to choose admitting the ghastliness in question. That refers to terminating children, not letting each state decide if it’s cool.

--

--

Anthony Bialy
Anthony Bialy

No responses yet